The Losers
Sometimes it's an easy decision, sometimes it's more
difficult. Occasionally you find a site which on the
surface looks very good and you spend hours looking it
over, comparing it to each part of your criteria.
Believe me, it's those last one's that hurt the most -
the site is gorgeous and wonderful, but ... it just does
not meet your criteria.
So what should you do? Should I send a note to the
webmaster to fill him in on what I found that was not
correct? Wouldn't he or she want to know? These
questions go through my mind every time I look at a site
which applies for one of my awards. Should I tell them
what's wrong?
NEVER. Let me be fully and completely
clear about this - NEVER UNDER ANY CONDITIONS,
WHETHER REQUESTED OR NOT, SEND BACK CRITICAL COMMENTS TO
ANYONE WHO HAS APPLIED FOR YOUR AWARDS PROGRAM.
NEVER. After all, if you apply your criteria to the
letter it should be obvious why the site didn't win the
award - it didn't meet the criteria.
There are lots of reasons not to tell webmasters why
they didn't get your award.
-
There is nothing more
devastating to a webmaster than getting back critical
comments, especially when those comments are not
anticipated. It's one thing to be in a classroom
environment and receive feedback, it's entirely a
different matter to have a professional webmaster tell
you your site is horrible or even that the "navigation
needs work".
-
Let's say you do send a
quick note which explains, "your navigation was
difficult to comprehend." Well, now the webmaster has
to send you an email back asking "what do you mean?"
After this, you might spend the next week trying to
explain what on earth you meant. Wouldn't it be better
to be working on your web site, doing your job or
taking your kids to the circus? The odds of you
winning this discussion are very low.
-
More often, you'll send
the note and get back an incredibly hostile response.
You have not made a friend.
-
And even more often, the
webmaster will not send a note back to you at all. You
will never hear from this person again. But the unkind
words will stick in his mind. He or she will be hurt
or unhappy.
-
Once in a while, your
words may discourage what could have been a good
webmaster. You may return to the site a few weeks
later and find it gone ... and you will never know
whether it was your comments that did it.
Once I received a comment
from an awardmaster who told me, in a very long email,
that my site was great but since I do not accept
psychiatric sites into my own awards program he could
not award me an award. Keep in mind his own criteria did
not mention such a restriction. I was so furious. How
dare this pinhead make that kind of comment?
I remember another woman
who had a beautiful site with some non-traditional
navigation (it was some floating squares and was
absolutely gorgeous). She didn't get an award and
received a response from the awardmaster which said her
navigation was terrible. She was upset and posted a note
to a newsgroup asking for a site review. Before long,
she got back a dozen responses, some negative some
positive. She was so confused, discouraged and unhappy.
Nothing good came from the comments.
I've known many beginning
webmasters who are just starting out. Of course their
GeoCities and Tripod sites are lacking ... but heck,
these people are beginners. What do you expect? Telling
them they didn't get the award because, well, their site
failed all 26 criteria points just will not make any
friends and, believe me, will not help anyone.
Okay, what about honorable
mention awards? Lord, I hate these ... this is a
wonderful way of saying, "your site was only a little
bit sucky". Come on, either give out the award or don't,
but please don't hand out honorable mentions.
My opinion: honorable
mention awards are the product of amateur awardmasters.
Don't include them in your program.
So what should you do about
those who do not win? It's simple ... don't do anything.
No matter how much time you spent judging the site, just
put it aside and resist any temptation to "help" or
"give some advice". Move on to the next web site without
looking back.
If the webmaster sends a
note asking (and this has only happened to me once),
well, then you can either (a) ignore the request or (b)
just send a quick note saying it didn't meet the
criteria. You can suggest he read the criteria again and
in, say, a few months he can resubmit his site. Don't
get into any details, even if he asks and says that he
wants to know. Believe me, he really doesn't.
The bottom line? Keep your
negative comments to yourself.
Additional Information






|